Skip to main content
Loading research indexW

PAR: Progress-Aligned Recurrence for Length Generalization in State Tracking

INVESTOR TAKEAWAY

Looped language models can run more iterations at test time, but additional iterations need not help them solve longer problems. For sequential state tracking, final-answer supervision does not specify how far each iteration should advance, and repeated updates can change the scale of the recurrent state.

ORIGINAL PAPER

PAR: Progress-Aligned Recurrence for Length Generalization in State Tracking

WHAT WE KNOW

We introduce Progress-Aligned Recurrence (PAR), which trains the prediction at iteration k to match the state after the first k operations and rescales recurrent states to their first-iteration norms. On swap-S_5, a Qwen2. 5-0.

WATCH NEXT

Review the primary source, validate the main result, and establish whether any listed-company transmission is direct.

EVIDENCE

What the evidence supports so far

Research signals

reasoning

training-method

scaling

What remains unverified

The full methodology, effect size, and limitations still require analyst review.

Company impact remains unverified until a direct economic transmission is established.